Skip to content

Phase III – Stealth Is.

“In the quietude, you may find solace in knowing.” “In knowing, you will find the solace of quietude.”

Archive

Tag: artificial intelligence


A software bot inspired by a popular theory of human consciousness takes the same time as humans to complete simple awareness tasks. Its creators say this feat means we are closer to understanding where consciousness comes from. It also raises the question of whether machines could ever have subjective experiences.

The bot, called LIDA for Learning Intelligent Distribution Agent, is based on “global workspace theory”. According to GWT, unconscious processing – the gathering and processing of sights and sounds, for example, is carried out by different, autonomous brain regions working in parallel. We only become conscious of information when it is deemed important enough to be “broadcast” to the global workspace, an assembly of connected neurons that span the brain. We experience this broadcast as consciousness, and it allows information to be shared across different brain regions and acted upon.

Recently, several experiments using electrodes have pinpointed brain activity that might correspond to the conscious broadcast, although how exactly the theory translates into cognition and conscious experience still isn’t clear.

To investigate, Stan Franklin, of the University of Memphis in Tennessee, built LIDA – software that incorporates key features of GWT, fleshed out with ideas about how these processes are carried out to produce what he believes to be a reconstruction of cognition.

Franklin based LIDA’s processing on a hypothesis that consciousness is composed of a series of millisecond-long cycles, each one split into unconscious and conscious stages. In the first of these stages – unconscious perception – LIDA scans the environment and copies what she detects to her sensory memory. Then specialised “feature detectors” scan sensory memory, pick out certain colours, sounds and movements, and pass these to a software module that recognises them as objects or events. For example, it might discover red pixels and “know” that a red light has been switched on. In the next phase, understanding, which is mainly unconscious, these pieces of data can be strung together and compared with the contents of LIDA’s long-term memory. Another set of processes use these comparisons to determine which objects or events are relevant or urgent. For example, if LIDA has been told to look out for a red light, this would be deemed highly salient. If this salience is above a certain threshold, says Franklin, “it suddenly steps over the edge of a cliff; it ignites”. That event along with some of its associated content will rise up into consciousness, winning a place in LIDA’s global workspace – a part of her “brain” that all other areas can access and learn from. This salient information drives which action is chosen. Then the cycle starts again.

Franklin reckons that similar cycles are the “building blocks for human cognition” and conscious experience. Although only one cycle can undergo conscious broadcast at a time, rather like the individual frames of a movie, successive broadcasts could be strung together quickly enough to give the sense of a seamless experience.

Features Robert Anton Wilson, Terrence McKenna, Aubrey de Grey & more:

The ‘Living Earth Simulator’ will mine economic, environmental and health data to create a model of the entire planet in real time.

When it comes to global crises, we’re not short of complex systems that look close to the edge: the climate, the food supply, energy security, the banking system and so on. Add to this the threat of war in many parts of the world and the possibility of global pandemics and it’s a wonder that anybody gets out of bed in the morning.

Science has certainly played an important role in understanding aspects of these systems but could it do more?

Today, Dirk Helbing at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Zurich outlines an ambitious project to go further, much further.

Helbing’s idea is to create a kind of Manahattan project to study, understand and tackle these techno-socio-economic-environmental issues. His plan is to gather data about the planet in unheard of detail, use it to simulate the behaviour of entire economies and then to predict and prevent crises from emerging.

Imagine a similar model that uses in real time things like financial transactions, health records, travel details, carbon dioxide emissions and so on to build a model of not just the planet but the entire society that populates it. Helbing calls it ‘reality mining’.

This model will be capable not only modelling the planet in real time but of simulating the future, rather in the manner of weather forecasters.

Helbing’s simulator will look for economic bubbles and collapses, warn of global pandemics and suggest how to tackle them, it will model and predict the outcome of regional conflicts and determine the effect of our behaviour on the climate. He even wants to create ‘situation rooms’ in which global leaders can view and manage crises as they occur.

This Google-Earth-on-steroids is to be called the Living Earth Simulator and Helbing’s plan is to have it working by 2022 at a cost of a cool EUR 1 billion, funded by the European Commission. He’s even assembled an impressive team to help, including partners from most of the top universities in Europe.

Really innovative approach to computer interfaces and meatspace metadata.

More about Pranav’s designs are avbl. at his TED presentation.
Pranav Mistry is a PhD student in the Fluid Interfaces Group at MIT’s Media Lab. Before his studies at MIT, he worked with Microsoft as a UX researcher; he’s a graduate of IIT. Mistry is passionate about integrating the digital informational experience with our real-world interactions.

Some previous projects from Mistry’s work at MIT includes intelligent sticky notes, Quickies, that can be searched and can send reminders; a pen that draws in 3D; and TaPuMa, a tangible public map that can act as Google of physical world. His research interests also include Gestural and Tangible Interaction, Ubiquitous Computing, AI, Machine Vision, Collective Intelligence and Robotics.

Re-Published here per multiple request for the article and key64 being dead as shit until they get their act together. Needs a Re-write/Updated – soon….

Circuit Bending – Modern DIY OcculTech

I could sit here and write the typical how-to BS article about circuit bending you can find anywhere on-line but instead Imma approach it in a spiritual sense. Circuit bending is one of the latest forms of occult technology to emerge over the past 20 years, and I would argue one of the most potent due to it’s correct form. You’re prolly wondering what qualifies this as occultech? I mean it’s just making instruments out of kids toys and abandoned other (usually) battery-operated noise producers, right? No, Wrong – it’s a direct channel into chaos, as circuit bending takes circuit boards and rewires them to send incorrect voltages to transitors, capacitors, etc. This results in Random output from the machine. It is in this manner that we establish a channel to divine chaos’ manifestation within this technomantic art.

Occultech is quite an antiquated notion really, throughout time magickal weapons, talismans, sigils, etc. have fufilled this role. Over the past century more analog occultech has come into being alongside further understanding and exploration of conciousness, one good example one be the Woodard Dream Machine.(LINK!!!!) In the modern day we have electronic technology which can fufill the roles of divination – we shouldn’t need to mention any tarot, astrological, or numerological based software, and even sorcery it’s self has moved into the digital realms (i.e. Psychotronics).

However, rarely is true randomness employed, and when it is usually it’s rather limited in the functions it triggers. The random algorithm in computer programming languages is based on the time function, a microsecond number is taken as the seed and run through an algebraic expression which produces a “semi-random” number. This is well and good and is certainly an example of generating randomness from each moment of the singularity embodied in that microsecond ued as the seed, but it is limited. Pre-exsisting circuitry designed to generate random output has exsisted for almost half a century and running an electrical current through these physical algorithms” can result in true randomness.

This is what is employed in the modding of pre-exsisting devices known as circuit bending. When we move beyond the cliche’ elements of making an instrument which produces bad noise and crappy tracks to accompany it (not always the case, but hey some people ARE lazy) and actually approach it in a spiritual manner, employing it in a ritualised audiotory enviorment evokes a divine presence manifest through chaos matrices from the machine at hand. In Circuit bending, you are building a magickal evocatory device for your art – now that’s fucking nifty IMO.

Why is it useful to employ random chaotic notions in your magick, though? Because it will distort your linear perception of time based events. This can be key to creating particular gnostic states. Circuit bending also allows the machine it’s own gnosis and when placed in a magickal enviorment both audiotory and physically, the machine’s random output will likewise produce magickal results. Those who speak of AI as the point of sentience for machines fail to see their level of conciousness in the moment of now. All matter has some level of conciousness. Conciousness is defined as the ability to react stimuli – even atoms react to the stimulus of any other atom they come into contact with. We are stuck on defining conciousness and sentience in terms of the quality that we experience these mechanisms through. This is err on our part; it stems from the perpetual trap of ego-centric perception. Mechanical/Electrical conciousness is in a state of evolution through interaction with ourselves. Silicon is evolving beyond it’s limited quality of mineral-based conciousness. As we alter the way we interact with it, we alot more room for growth of this newly emerging sentience. Giving something multiple options with a random assignment to outcome is base level sentience. If it were a servitor you’d call it sentient, mayhaps because it’s more likely to be semi-humanoid in that form? For all you know it is merely a construct of the self and not comprised of anything other than a small portion of the randomly assembled Kia you consist of. That’s not a good argument in favor of it being in possession of any sentience beyond yourself.

Whilst we’re on the subject of future-tech, let’s ponder some of the ways circuit bending heralds on-coming spiritual technology. Firstly, EEG/Brainwave interfacing with machines is represented in a very base-level format through the employment of contact points which interject one’s electrical resonance on the skin from your biocomputer directly into the circuit, this can result in a multitude of effects and shift the randomness based on this human-machine interface’s presence. This does indeed foreshadow on-coming interface-oriented changes in technology. In addition to this circuit bending will similiarly use lightwaves to alter it’s output. It was not so long ago, shortly after the turn of the century, that magick was expressed in terms of lightwaves and the ether. As time progressed, this model was dethroned to a degree by quantum physics. When wave-particle duality suffered a similiar fate in the aforementioned field, the model of string theory replaced it. String theory was literally disproven by the (re)introduction of an 11th dimension into it’s model, yielding an M-theory singulairty. Point is, all said and done, despite the modern take (or lack thereof at points), Lightwaves are still able to be carriers of magick and information and computers aren’t introducting lightwaves into their circuits VIA interfaces to affect their product.

Magick has always been an empowering DIY art, it’s practitioners have utilized many tools in a variety of manner throughout time. The modern neophyte technomancer is disempowered from the get go simply based on where (s)he’ll stand relative to the large amounts of information needed to execute an operation through the technical aspects of this art. As a result He/She has only the option of utilizing pre-formed digi-tools for executing work – esp. looking towards computer-based solutions to magickal questions. Often times you can find an executable that claims to do what you need but did you write it off of principals you researched and thus believed to be true? Essentially circuit bending offers us a simple and elegant solution for building occultech out of equipment brought into your possession – often times through synchronicity – as a means of digital invocation and evocation.

An interesting take on the role computer programs may have played in the current economic down turn. Nice thoughts by Kurzweil also towards the end also.

The recent economic meltdown has renewed the salience of the question of the relationship between human beings and computers. A survey of various experts in the fields of economics, information science, and artificial intelligence (AI) reveals general agreement that substantial responsibility for the global crisis belongs to people not programs — but beyond that, the consensus breaks down.

The effect of advances in information technology on the financial sector raises more questions than it answers: How can transactions understood by few — if any — experts be subject to effective government regulation? Is the current crisis a symptom of human dependency on information-processing machines created by man but now beyond man’s control?